Instruments to Evaluate and Improve IT Architecture Work
Instrumenten ter Evaluatie en Verbetering van IT-Architectuur Werk (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands)Instruments to Evaluate and Improve IT Architecture Work
Instrumenten ter Evaluatie en Verbetering van IT-Architectuur Werk (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands)Samenvatting
Author Supplied:
In the last decades, architecture has emerged as a discipline in the domain of Information Technology (IT). A well-accepted definition of architecture is from ISO/IEC 42010: "The fundamental organization of a system, embodied in its components, their relationships to each other and the environment, and the principles governing its design and evolution." Currently, many levels and types of architecture in the domain of IT have been defined. We have scoped our work to two types of architecture: enterprise architecture and software architecture.
IT architecture work is demanding and challenging and includes, inter alia, identifying architectural significant requirements (functional and non-functional), designing and selecting solutions for these requirements, and ensuring that the solutions are implemented according to the architectural design. To reflect on the quality of architecture work, we have taken ISO/IEC 8402 as a starting point. It defines quality as "the totality of characteristics of an entity that bear on its ability to satisfy stated requirements". We consider architecture work to be of high quality, when it is effective; when it answers stated requirements.
Although IT Architecture has been introduced in many organizations, the elaboration does not always proceed without problems. In the domain of enterprise architecture, most practices are still in the early stages of maturity with, for example, low scores on the focus areas ‘Development of architecture’ and ‘Monitoring’ (of the implementation activities). In the domain of software architecture, problems of the same kind are observed. For instance, architecture designs are frequently poor and incomplete, while architecture compliance checking is performed in practice on a limited scale only.
With our work, we intend to contribute to the advancement of architecture in the domain of IT and the effectiveness of architecture work by means of the development and improvement of supporting instruments and tools. In line with this intention, the main research question of this thesis is:
How can the effectiveness of IT architecture work be evaluated and improved?
Organisatie | Hogeschool Utrecht |
Afdeling | Kenniscentrum Technologie en Innovatie |
Datum | 2015-11-25 |
Type | Proefschrift |
Taal | Engels |