De grootste kennisbank van het HBO

Inspiratie op jouw vakgebied

Vrij toegankelijk

Terug naar zoekresultatenDeel deze publicatie

Effects of the application of a checklist during trauma resuscitations on ATLS adherence, team performance, and patient-related outcomes: a systematic review

Open access

Effects of the application of a checklist during trauma resuscitations on ATLS adherence, team performance, and patient-related outcomes: a systematic review

Open access

Samenvatting

Purpose In this systematic literature review, the effects of the application of a checklist during in hospital resuscitation
of trauma patients on adherence to the ATLS guidelines, trauma team performance, and patient-related outcomes were
integrated.
Methods A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Metaanalyses
checklist. The search was performed in Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane inception till January 2019.
Randomized controlled- or controlled before-and-after study design were included. All other forms of observational study
designs, reviews, case series or case reports, animal studies, and simulation studies were excluded. The Effective Public
Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool was applied to assess the methodological quality of the included studies.
Results Three of the 625 identified articles were included, which all used a before-and-after study design. Two studies showed
that Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS)-related tasks are significantly more frequently performed when a checklist was
applied during resuscitation. [14 of 30 tasks (p < 0.05), respectively, 18 of 19 tasks (p < 0.05)]. One study showed that time
to task completion (− 9 s, 95% CI = − 13.8 to − 4.8 s) and workflow improved, which was analyzed as model fitness (0.90
vs 0.96; p < 0.001); conformance frequency (26.1% vs 77.6%; p < 0.001); and frequency of unique workflow traces (31.7%
vs 19.1%; p = 0.005). One study showed that the incidence of pneumonia was higher in the group where a checklist was
applied [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.69, 95% Confidence Interval (CI 1.03–2.80)]. No difference was found for nine other
assessed complications or missed injuries. Reduced mortality rates were found in the most severely injured patient group
(Injury Severity score > 25, aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30–0.89).
Conclusions The application of a checklist may improve ATLS adherence and workflow during trauma resuscitation. Current
literature is insufficient to truly define the effect of the application of a checklist during trauma resuscitation on patientrelated
outcomes, although one study showed promising results as an improved chance of survival for the most severely
injured patients was found.

Toon meer
OrganisatieHogeschool Utrecht
AfdelingKenniscentrum Gezond en Duurzaam Leven
LectoraatProactieve zorg voor thuiswonende ouderen
Gepubliceerd inEuropean Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery Uitgave: 46, Pagina's: 65-72
Jaar2020
TypeArtikel
DOI10.1007/s00068-019-01181-7
TaalEngels

Op de HBO Kennisbank vind je publicaties van 26 hogescholen

De grootste kennisbank van het HBO

Inspiratie op jouw vakgebied

Vrij toegankelijk