De grootste kennisbank van het HBO

Inspiratie op jouw vakgebied

Vrij toegankelijk

Terug naar zoekresultatenDeel deze publicatie

The Clash between Fundamental Rights, Mutual Recognition & Public Security

Recent developments in the CJEU’s case law in the field of AFSJ

Open access

Rechten:Alle rechten voorbehouden
Nominee for The Hague University of Applied Sciences Thesis Award 2017 / Genomineerd voor de Haagse Hogeschool Afstudeerprijs 2017

The Clash between Fundamental Rights, Mutual Recognition & Public Security

Recent developments in the CJEU’s case law in the field of AFSJ

Open access

Rechten:Alle rechten voorbehouden
Nominee for The Hague University of Applied Sciences Thesis Award 2017 / Genomineerd voor de Haagse Hogeschool Afstudeerprijs 2017

Samenvatting

This article focuses on the recent judgment of the Court of Justice, Aranyosi and Caldararu. After conducting a legal analysis on this case, three issues are identified and they are separately discussed in three sections. The aim of this paper is to show the impact of this judgment on public order and public security in Europe on the one hand and on the individual’s fundamental rights, on the other hand. It is going to be argued that even though there are limits to the principle of mutual recognition, this new exception based on fundamental rights establishes a new procedure for non-surrender. Therefore, the Court of Justice creates a non-execution ground which the EU legislator did not intend to include in the Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant. This is explained by looking at the three interconnected notions of Freedom, Security and Justice.

OrganisatieDe Haagse Hogeschool
OpleidingBRV HBO-Rechten / PLS Laws
AfdelingFaculteit Bestuur, Recht & Veiligheid
Jaar2017
TypeBachelor
TaalEngels

Op de HBO Kennisbank vind je publicaties van 26 hogescholen

De grootste kennisbank van het HBO

Inspiratie op jouw vakgebied

Vrij toegankelijk